Pat Sajak Sick of Liberal Celebrities Like Jimmy Kimmel Running Their Mouths–Shut Them Out With…

Some of “Wheel of Fortune” host Pat Sajak’s comments have gone viral — and they’re sparking controversy.

Throughout the year, Sajak has repeatedly made subtle jabs at the more liberal celebrities in Hollywood, raising eyebrows.

After Jimmy Kimmel made an emotional plea for gun control following October’s Las Vegas massacre, Sajak quickly mocked the TV host on Twitter, Western Journalism reports.

“OK, let me explain this again: We’re celebs,” Sajak tweeted. “We’re wiser & more empathetic than you. We are famous. Please take our opinions more seriously.”Wheel Of FortuneBut it’s just one of the many times Sajak has sarcastically derided liberal celebrities.

After the Golden Globes awards show in January, in which many blasted then-President-elect Donald Trump, Sajak again tweeted criticism, reports CNN.

“Looking forward to the next awards show/lecture,” Sajak wrote, after actress Meryl Streep gave a speech implicitly denouncing the president.

“Nobody abhors violence more than Hollywood, and nobody does more to glorify it,” he added in a separate comment.

He again took to Twitter during the inauguration protests.

“Unhappy about results of last week’s People’s Choice Awards,” he wrote. “Thinking of breaking Starbucks windows & trashing limos.”

“I wonder if the celebrities who moved out of the country will return for the demonstrations,” read another of his comments.

Sajak’s comments quickly sparked uproar online.

“Sorry Pat but I think less of you if you are really pleased with the Trump presidency,” wrote one person in All That’s News’ comments section. “He is really out of his element and pretty scary.”

Others thought it was unfair of Sajak to criticize other celebrities, arguing they have a right to free speech like everyone else.

“Last time I checked…they are constituents too,” argued another. “They live in this country so they have a stake in what the president does. They deserve to speak their opinions just like you and I. Their opinions are no more important than yours or mine they just have more visibility and a bigger platform because they are famous. That doesn’t mean they should have to be quiet and take it.”Others disagreed and ardently supported Sajak’s stance.

“They have a right in their circles on their time,” commented one reader. “Not mine. If I go to a concert or a play or a sporting event the I PAY to see which pays their big salaries they have no right to offer me entertainment for money and then ruin my night with what I consider to be their idiotic views.”

CBS News Reported:

“Wheel of Fortune” host Pat Sajak is trying to extinguish the firestorm he sparked on Twitter earlier this week with a tweet about climate change.

It all began with a tweet taking aim at “global warming alarmists” — calling them “unpatriotic racists.”

I now believe global warming alarmists are unpatriotic racists knowingly misleading for their own ends. Good night.

— Pat Sajak (@patsajak) May 20, 2014
More than 1,800 people “favorited” the tweet, and more than 2,000 have retweeted it, a small fraction of his more than 54,000 followers. While his supporters loved it, the tweet also sparked an immediate backlash.

Salon.com posted an article blasting Sajak for “throwing wild allegations of racism against the overwhelming majority of scientists.” The post noted that Sajak has written a series of blog posts for a conservative website called Human Events. One of the articles was titled, “Opposed to Obamacare? Then You Must be a Racist.”

In another of the posts, he said he is a “Conservative Republican delighted with the disarray on the Democratic side.” Many conservatives have depicted climate change as a ruse created by liberals and alarmists.

In a Human Events post from 2007, Sajak offered the clearest indication of his thoughts on climate change and the debate that surrounds it.

“The subject of man-made global warming is almost impossible to discuss without a descent into virulent name-calling (especially on the Internet, where anonymity breeds a special kind of vicious reaction to almost any social or political question), but I’ll try anyway.”Image result for Pat Sajak's Comments Spark ControversyThe post went on to list his 10 questions surrounding climate change. He admitted to being “on the skeptical side” on the matter, but did not say he overtly denies it.

Since the time of that post in 2007, scientists have provided more evidence that climate change is man-made and that its impact is already being felt around the globe. Of course, there is still a cadre of deniers.

So should Sajak’s tweet be taken as an indication that he has continued studying the matter, finally made up his mind, and decided to join the name-calling?

Well, no. His spokesman tells CBS News it was just a joke.

In a statement issued Wednesday evening, Sajak said, “Of course I was joking. Just mocking the name-calling that is directed at global warming skeptics within and without the scientific community.”

Looking at other tweets in his Twitter feed, it’s obvious that Sajak doesn’t always take things too seriously. In the past week, he’s posted humorous comments on issues ranging from the Tooth Fairy to the debate between paper or plastic, and presidential birth certificates.

Even though I told him it was settled folklore, my young nephew remains a Tooth Fairy denier. (Those kids today!)

— Pat Sajak (@patsajak) May 19, 2014
Grocery checkout agony: Do I destroy forests, strangle helpless sea creatures or use my own bacteria-laden containers?

— Pat Sajak (@patsajak) May 17, 2014
Walking along beach in HI & found presidential birth certificate that had washed up. Had no idea Bush was born here.Image result for Pat Sajak's Comments Spark Controversy— Pat Sajak (@patsajak) May 15, 2014
In April, he also announced his heterosexuality in a tweet that caught the attention of the sites Queerty.com and NewNowNext.com.

Damn the career consequences! I’m hereby proclaiming my heterosexuality!

— Pat Sajak (@patsajak) April 18, 2014
And then there’s this…

The world would be such a wonderful place without human beings. Just animals breathing clean air & eating each other.

— Pat Sajak (@patsajak) May 12, 2014
The Twitter controversy calls to mind the recent turmoil surrounding Stephen Colbert. On March 27, one of the social media managers for his Comedy Central show, “The Colbert Report,” quoted a line from an on-air segment. Taken out of context, some interpreted it as racist.

Within minutes, the hashtag “#CancelColbert” started trending. It continued trending for nearly 36 hours. Colbert addressed the critics during his next show on March 31.

“Folks, I’m still here,” he said, pointing directly at the camera. “The dark forces trying to silence my message of core conservative principles mixed with youth friendly product placement have been thwarted,” he said, before airing an entire segment titled “Who’s Attacking Me Now?”

The Colbert controversy blew over after he addressed it, mainly because Colbert reminded the audience that he said it in comedic character, as part of a segment criticizing the owner of the Washington Redskins NFL franchise over insensitivity to Native Americans.Image result for Pat Sajak's Comments Spark ControversySajak posted a clue that suggests he’s enjoying the uproar.

Sometimes it’s fun to poke a stick in a hornets’ nest just to hear the buzzing.

— Pat Sajak (@patsajak) May 20, 2014
What will Sajak give us next? If this is any indication, it’s sure to keep the debate going.

Later today I’ll be tweeting my views on the subjects of nuclear proliferation and free-range chicken.

— Pat Sajak (@patsajak) May 21, 2014
His tweet has also inspired humor from at least one former fan of Sajak’s TV show.

“No more Wheel of Fortune in my house, I can tell you that,” wrote blogger Greg Laden, who suggested a new puzzle for the show:

WikiLeaks: Clinton Bribed 6 Republicans To ‘Destroy Trump’

WikiLeaks has released information that shows Hillary Clinton campaign staffers bribing 6 Republicans to “destroy Trump”.Inan email from John Podesta to Huma Abedin, the pair discuss diverting Clinton campaign funds to various Republicans who were secretly on the Clinton payroll.Image result for WikiLeaks: Clinton Bribed 6 Republicans To ‘Destroy Trump’The email, sent in July of this year, describes how funds were being diverted from Clinton’s campaign to the Super PACS of Jeb Bush, Carly Fiorina, and John Kasich.

According to the email:
“JB, CF, and JK PACS will be noticeably silent for the rest of the campaign. Each will receive a significant allowance from advertising budget. HRC is in the loop and has talked to all three personally. Eyes only.”
Other emails that surfaced but do not refer to anything other than title have also surfaced that raised eyebrowS. It seems at a glance that the Clinton Foundation, or as I am calling it, the Pantsuit Mafia, has bought off several key members of the Republican Party to push the Clinton agenda Such as

“He is on board, will retract the invitation to speak. Eyes only.”
This email was dated days before Speaker of the House Paul Ryan withdrew the invitation to Donald Trump to speak at an event in Wisconsin. Even though we do not have the ‘smoking gun’ to say it was him, no other logical conclusion can be assumed.
Other emails hint at the money being moved to Republican elected officials in the House and Senate. For instance FEC reports shows that two large donations from PACS and private sources ln early October went to John McCain right after he attacked Trump publicly criticized Trump. That happened shortly after a slew of emails concerning moving money to support one candidate and move support from another.Shortly thereafter, his challenger in this tight race, Kirkpatrick, lost several key donors and money and support lessened from the DNC and the DSCC in the last few weeks of the race. The thing to note is that McCain is one of the lead sponsors of a committee to investigate any Russian influence into the election.Related imageSenator Lindsay Graham, another outspoken critic of Donald Trump and briefly candidate for President from July to December also it seems received help from the Clintons. An email that simply states, “Cleared the road for him in 2020,could mean that there will be no strong or supported Democrat in the South Carolina Senate race when Graham is up for re election.

As with McCain, Graham has publicly called for a look into the Russian influence in the election.
There were a lot of politicians who were opposed to Donald Trump. These, in particular, all share a common bond, however: Trump humiliated them on stage in front of hundreds of millions of people around the world. This is more than just politics or conscientious objecting, this was revenge.
Not just revenge. This is out and out treason. Our representatives took an oath to support our Constitution and its laws for our benefit, not theirs. This is why gridlock is prevalent in D.C the treachery and the corruption are on both sides of the coin.

Unfortunately, there is no way of knowing who the true Republicans are and who are the ones that are fronts for the Clinton machine, the Pantsuit Mafia. The number of emails is too overwhelming to easily sift through them all to find all of the turncoat RINOs. We must be diligent to ferret out those that have sold their souls for power.Related imageThe only hope that we have for transparency of the Clintons anytime soon rests in an audit carried out by the IRS.
Behold, in recent days, there is a call to impeach the Commissioner of the IRS. Interesting times we live in to be sure. Only time and work on our part will push this audit forward.Even though Hillary lost the Presidency, she is still a power behind the scenes with these revelations. With her Democratic allies in Pelosi and Schumer and her Republican lackeys in the form of Ryan and other Republicans, she will set the agenda and pull the strings. We the people will have no idea who is on our side and who is not.
For the Clintons, it will mean that even though the American people are supporting Trump and making America great again, they will set the agenda. We will be left scratching our heads and wondering how the GOP and Trump cannot accomplish anything. Clinton will be in control without having to ever show her hand or be responsible to the people.
The Soros-Clinton team will have killed the Republic and we will never know until it is too late.This Russian news story perhaps is the ultimate coup for the Clinton Camp. She does not even have to be the winner of the Electoral College vote to have gained power. Should enough electors defect to Hillary or name another candidate in their votes Electors are NOT legally bound to vote for their candidate, then that could throw the vote into the House and Senate.
The suspicious part of this simply is this, On January 20th a new president will be inaugurated. The Constitution in the 25th Amendment spells out the line of succession if there is still not a picked President, the Vice President shall become president Kaine or Pence.Related imageIf the Senate has not picked a Vice-President by noon on the 20th, the Speaker of the House shall become President. Coincidence?The Roman Republic lasted for centuries in the hands of the people before falling to become the Roman Empire. That change did not happen by a foreign invasion or foreign intrigue. No barbarian or forceful enemy defeated that Republic over 2000 years ago.
It was defeated from the inside by the treachery of the Senate and the blood of the slain Julius Caesar. Just as Caesar was stabbed in the back by men he thought were his allies, Trump is facing the same treachery.
In the coming days and months, without our help and diligence, President Trump may also be gasping Et Tu, Paul?

Monica Lewinsky Exposes Clintons-Leaves Them Ashamed (Video)

Monica Lewinsky opened up in a new interview about being bullied after details of her affair with then-President Bill Clinton emerged (video below).

In 1998, Lewinsky became the subject of much ridicule after it was revealed that she had engaged in a sexual relationship with Bill Clinton.

Lewinsky opened up about the aftermath in an interview on ITV’s “This Morning.” She spoke about her experience with cyber bullying and revealed that she felt as though “the whole world was laughing” at her.

Lewinsky was a White House intern when she engaged in an affair with the president. A news report broke in 1998 revealing the affair, leading to Lewinsky becoming a household name. According to All That’s News, Lewinsky was 24 years old at the time of the scandal.She was mocked on message boards online and said that she considers herself to be one of the first victims of cyberbullying.

“It’s hard for us to imagine in today’s world because of the internet, things break within seconds, but from a personal perspective, to have gone to bed as a private person and to awaken the next morning with the world knowing me was shocking,” she revealed in the interview. “There was no one who had gone through an online scandal in the same way losing a digital reputation overnight.”

Lewinsky launched a campaign against cyberbullying. She encourages people to “click with compassion” and she uses her platform to share tips on how victims of cyberbullying can handle being targeted.

The former White House intern, who has worked as an activist and fashion designer since the 1998 scandal, said that before writing something online, you should consider whether you would say what you wrote to somebody’s face. She also encouraged users not to click on any links which publicly shame an individual.

When asked what she would tell her younger self, as well as other victims of bullying, now, Lewinsky said, “hold on to who you are.”“What’s different about being harassed or shamed online is there’s no border, it’s not at school or if I made a gaffe at a dinner party where it’s a contained audience, when it happened online you feel like the whole world is laughing at you,” she said. “I couldn’t count how many horrible things people online had said about me, but I could count when somebody said something face to face on one hand.”
Another Source:’You feel like the whole world is laughing at you’: Monica Lewinsky shares advice on coping with bullying as she reveals how it felt to be shamed in the wake of Bill Clinton sex scandal

Monica Lewinsky became internationally famous overnight when it emerged she’d had a sexual relationship with then US President Bill Clinton.

The then office worker was vilified by the public when details of their affair surfaced in 1998, and went on to become the subject of ridicule online in the very early days of the internet.

Lewinsky, now 44, appeared on ITV’s This Morning on Wednesday to share her experience of cyber bullying, and revealed how she felt ‘the whole world was laughing’ at her.

Now campaigning against cyber-bullying by encouraging people to ‘click with compassion’, she shared her tips on how to cope for people being targeted, having lost her own ‘digital reputation’ overnight.

Asked what she would say to her younger self if she could, the activist replied: ‘Hold on to who you are.’

The Lewinsky scandal broke in 1998, when a news report emerged saying then-President Bill Clinton had an affair with Lewinsky, who was a White House intern.Lewisky had confided in a female colleague about the affair who recorded their conversationShe was ruthlessly mocked on early online message boards and comment threads, and considers herself to be one of the very first victims of cyber bullying.

Lewinsky, who has worked as a fashion designer and activist since the scandal, gave tips on how to prevent cyber bullying.

She advised thinking before you click, and recommended asking yourself whether you’d say what you’re typing to someone’s face. Lewinsky also urged people not to click on anything that publicly shames another person, and to support people who are suffering by sending messages and even nice emojis so they feel less alone.

Lewinsky was just 24-years-old when news of the Clinton sex scandal broke in 1998, after she confided in a female colleague about the affair.

Clinton first forcefully denied the allegations, saying in January that year in a public statement: ‘I want to say one thing to the American people. I want you to listen to me … I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky.

He eventually admitted in August 1998 to having an inappropriate relationship with Lewinsky.

Speaking on This Morning, Lewinsky said she would tell her younger self and other victims of bullying to ‘hold on to who you are’.

She said: ‘What’s different about being harassed or shamed online is there’s no border, it’s not at school or if I made a gaffe at a dinner party where it’s a contained audience, when it happened online you feel like the whole world is laughing at you.’

‘I couldn’t count how many horrible things people online had said about me, but I could count when somebody said something face to face on one hand,’ she added.

 

FBI Reveals What Comey Destroyed To Protect Hillary From Prison

There are a couple of Biblically-based adages that I think are appropriate for this particular story. “You reap what you sow” and “Be sure your sin will find you out.”Image result for james comey hillary clintonFor both James Comey and Hillary Clinton, they had the hubris to believe that their positions of political power allowed them to be above the law of the land. In fact, they used their political power as the main reason to get comfortable in breaking the law. They had it in their heads that they would never get caught. And, if they ever in fact did get caught, they would get away with their crimes!

Well, now Comey is reaping what he sowed, and both he and Hillary’s sins have been found out!

One senator has released the draft given to him by the FBI that reveals Comey’s plan to exonerate Hillary for all of her crimes. We now have written proof that Comey had written out felony and misdemeanor violations on Hillary. However, he shortly thereafter took the easy way out and changed the language to protect her from any such charges and indictment.

Ex-FBI Director James Comey’s original statement closing out the probe into Hillary Clinton‘s use of a private email server was edited by subordinates to remove five separate references to terms like “grossly negligent” and to delete mention of evidence supporting felony and misdemeanor violations, according to copies of the full document.

Comey also originally concluded that it was “reasonably likely” that Clinton’s nonsecure private server was accessed or hacked by hostile actors though there was no evidence to prove it. But that passage was also changed to the much weaker “possible,” the memos show.

The full draft and edits were released on the website of Senate Homeland and Government Affairs Committee Chairman Ron Johnson R-Wis., providing the most complete public accounting to date of Comey’s draft and the subsequent edits.

The draft, released in full for the first time on Thursday, offers new details on the FBI’s Clinton investigation and controversial conclusion.

You can read through the draft HERE

The full draft, with edits, leaves little doubt that Comey originally wrote on May 2, 2016 that there was evidence that Clinton and top aides may have violated both felony and misdemeanor statutes, though he did not believe he could prove intent before a jury.Image result for FBI Reveals What Comey Destroyed To Protect Hillary From Prison“Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statute proscribing gross negligence in the handling of classified information and of the statute proscribing misdemeanor mishandling, my judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case,” Comey originally penned.

That passage, however, was edited to remove the references to “gross negligence” and “misdemeanor mishandling,” leaving a much more generic reference to “potential violations of the statutes.”

The FBI has told Congress the edits were made by subordinates to Comey and then accepted by the then-director before he made his final announcement July 5, 2016 that he would not pursue criminal charges against Clinton.

Though it seems like Hillary and her entourage will never ever have to pay for their crimes, be patient. Drafts like Comey’s and other such shenanigans will indeed be brought to the public light, and soon they all will have to reap what they’ve sowed, in prison.

Johnson recently sent a letter to new FBI Director Christopher Wray demanding to know why such significant edits were made to Comey’s draft and whether they were part of an effort by FBI subordinates to politically protect Clinton from a harsher assessment during the 2016 election.

“The edits to Director Comey’s public statement, made months prior to the conclusion of the FBI’s investigation of Secretary Clinton’s conduct, had a significant impact on the FBI’s public evaluation of the implications of her actions,” Johnson wrote, noting recently released text messages show some senior FBI officials involved in the case harbored political hatred for Donald Trump or preference for Clinton.

“This effort, seen in light of the personal animus toward then-candidate Trump by senior agents leading the Clinton investigation and their apparent desire to create an ‘insurance policy’ against Mr. Trump’s election, raise profound questions about the FBI’s role and possible interference in the 2016 presidential election,” Johnson wrote.

One edit that concerned Johnson was a decision to delete from Comey’s original draft a reference to the FBI working on a joint assessment with the intelligence community about possible national security damage from the classified information that passed through Clinton’s non-secure email servers.

“We have done extensive work with the assistance of our colleagues elsewhere in the Intelligence Community to understand what indications there might be of compromise by hostile actors in connection with the private email operation,” Comey originally wrote.Related imageJohnson now wants to know whether other intelligence agencies had assessments of damage that differed or were more negative than that of the FBI.

Johnson also demanded the FBI provide him the “editing comments” in the margins of the Comey memo that were redacted before Congress was given the document, so lawmakers can better understand the intent of some of the changes that were made.

The full document shows that when Comey first sent to his top deputies the draft statement May 2, 2016, announcing Clinton wouldn’t face criminal charges, he imagined it would be part of an austere news conference where he took no questions from reporters. That event did not happen until two months later.

“I’ve been trying to imagine what it would look like if I decided to do an FBI only press event to close out our work and hand the matter to [the Justice Department],” Comey wrote. “To help shape our discussions of whether that, or something different, makes sense, I have spent some time crafting what I would say, which follows. In my imagination, I don’t see me taking any questions.

California Gov. Jerry Brown To Force Schools To Show Kids ‘Gay Sex’

California Governor Jerry Brown has mandated the use of gay pornography in elementary schools in order to teach children about LGBT sex.

This makes California the first state in the union to not only use mandatory LGBT-inclusive textbooks in schools, but also force young children to learn sexually explicit material without the choice of opting out.Image result for California Gov. Jerry Brown To Force Schools To Show Kids ‘Gay Sex’The textbooks will include references to famous gay celebrities and public figures, as well as detail the various sexual choices a gay person has.

Truthrevolt.org reports: That law requires a “fair, accurate, inclusive, and respectful” treatment of homosexual, bisexual, transgender, and lesbian Americans despite the historical insignificance.

“We’re not trying to make anybody gay; we’re not saying there’s an agenda; we’re not saying that these people are better than other people; what we’re saying is this is another group of Americans and they face certain prejudices,” said state publisher Mark Jarrett, whose history textbooks include special mention of the sexual preferences of historical figures like Jane Adams, Emily Dickinson, Nathaniel Hawthorne, President James Buchanan, though it’s inconclusive if these prominent Americans were gay or not.

“I think we should say, ‘Buchanan, he never married. He had a very good friend who was living with him. He may have been gay,’” Jarrett added. “On the other hand, at that time, being gay was seen as something evil and wrong.”

California approved the textbooks written by Jarrett, a Ph.D, to be used in the 8th grade.

Students will read that legendary stagecoach driver Charlie Parkhurst “was a woman who identified as a man,” according to Fox News.

They will read that George Washington’s chief of staff Baron Von Steuben “may have been gay,” and that poet Walt Whitman “was drawn to young men… but denied his same sex preferences in public.”

Critics say much of these accounts are speculation, but California rejected any publisher that didn’t mention the homosexual preferences or claims against historical figures in their textbooks.Image result for California Gov. Jerry Brown To Force Schools To Show Kids ‘Gay Sex’In one textbook, the state forced the publisher to add “lesbian” to describe NASA astronaut Sally Ride.

And here we thought the Democratic Party was the party of “choice.” Clearly the state knows better than the parents what children need to learn.

Read More:California Gov. Jerry Brown signs landmark law to teach gay history in schools

Gov. Jerry Brown signed a bill Thursday making California the first state in the nation to add lessons about gays and lesbians to social studies classes in public schools.

Brown, a Democrat, signed the landmark bill requiring public schools to include the contributions of people who are gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender in social studies curriculum. The Democratic-majority Legislature had passed the bill last week on a largely party-line vote.

“History should be honest,” the governor said in a statement. “This bill revises existing laws that prohibit discrimination in education and ensures that the important contributions of Americans from all backgrounds and walks of life are included in our history books.”

The bill has drawn criticism from some churches and conservative groups that argue such instruction would expose students to a subject that some parents find objectionable.

Republican lawmakers who opposed the bill had called it a well-intentioned but ill-conceived bill. Some raised concerns that it would indoctrinate children to accept homosexuality.

State Sen. Mark Leno, a Democrat from San Francisco and the bill’s author, hailed the bill signing as a step toward teaching tolerance. Supporters say the bill will teach students to be more accepting of gays and lesbians in light of the bullying that happens to gay students.

“Today we are making history in California by ensuring that our textbooks and instructional materials no longer exclude the contributions of LGBT Americans,” Leno said in a statement.Image result for California Gov. Jerry Brown To Force Schools To Show Kids ‘Gay Sex’California law already requires schools to teach about women, African Americans, Mexican Americans, entrepreneurs, Asian Americans, European Americans, American Indians and labor. The Legislature over the years also has prescribed specific lessons about the Irish potato famine and the Holocaust, among other topics.

The new law, SB48, requires the California Board of Education and local school districts to adopt textbooks and other teaching materials that cover the contributions and roles of sexual minorities, as soon as the 2013-2014 school year.

The legislation leaves it to local school boards to decide how to implement the requirement. It does not specify a grade level for the instruction to begin.

Randy Thomasson, president of SaveCalifornia.com, a conservative family group, said under the new law parents will have no choice but to take their children out of public school and homeschool them to avoid what he said was “immoral indoctrination.” The new law applies only to public schools, not private schools or families who homeschool.

“Jerry Brown has trampled the parental rights of the overwhelming majority of California fathers and mothers who don’t want their children to be sexually brainwashed at school,” Thomasson said. “This new law will prohibit textbooks and teachers from telling children the facts that homosexuality is neither healthy nor biological.”

The bill was supported by gay rights organizations including Equality California and the Gay-Straight Alliance Network. Teacher groups also said the bill would help students prepare for a diverse and evolving society.

“There is no room for discrimination of any kind in our classrooms, our communities or our state,” said Dean Vogel, president of the California Teachers Association.

Chaffetz Just Dropped a Bombshell About the Deep State in Washington — It’s “Very Real…”

Former Utah Representative Jason Chaffetz confirmed what many Americans have feared for some time now, telling the hosts of TV’s Fox & Friends that the deep state is “very real,” and that he has first-hand experience of its inner workings.“I was a little skeptical … but I’m telling you, having lived through it, it is very real” the former member of the House of Representatives said when asked about whether or not he believed that there was a deep state conspiracy working against President Donald Trump. He went on to say that he believes that the conspirators, many of whom are currently under investigation by Rep. Devin Nunes, are likely to obstruct further investigations into their actions while deceiving the American public and pretending to cooperate.

“I guarantee you, the Department of Justice will tout how many documents they are turning over,” Chaffetz said. “The question that [House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman] Trey Gowdy always asked, which is the right one, is what percentage of the documents [asked for are being turned over]? Because, if you want 100 percent of the truth on a closed case, then turn over all the documents. But I don’t think they’re going to do it. They’ve been asking for these documents under subpoena since August and they still haven’t gotten them.”

Chaffetz also says he believes the deep state prevented an indictment from being filed against Hillary Clinton, despite the overwhelming amount of evidence collected that proved she had committed a crime. “There was hammers, there was BleachBit. When you listen to James Comey back in July of 2016, you really thought that she was actually to get indicted. But this is a closed case” he said, saying he was certain that she would be brought to trial the summer of 2016, and was floored when the FBI announced she was being cleared of all charges.

With all of the proof of the deep state’s existence, and seemingly more coming out every day, it is baffling that some continue to deny its existence. Hopefully, however, Devin Nunes will be able to finally pull the mask off of those actively working to bring down our government and will herald in a new era when we can truly Make America Great Again.Image result for ChaffetzRead More:As Jason Chaffetz Retires From Congress, Here Are Some Reasons Not To Miss Him

Just days out from his departure from Congress, Republican Rep. Jason Chaffetz said he’s leaving to “get off the crazy train” in an interview with Fox News Wednesday evening.

Chaffetz, who also served as chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, is vacating his position at the end of June and recently secured a contract to serve as an on-air contributor with Fox News.

“I said I would get in, serve and get out,” Chaffetz said on Fox News. “Fifteen hundred nights I’ve spent away from my family, and there comes a point where you got to get more balance in your life.”

The outgoing representative from Utah recently said American taxpayers should provide a $30,000 housing stipend to the 535 members of Congress so they can afford real estate in Washington, D.C. (Chaffetz is no stranger to controversial comments: In March, he told CNN Americans should forego purchasing an iPhone in order to invest in their health care.)

He told Fox News his decision to leave Congress was “partly” due to financial reasons.

“Faced with another 100 to 200 nights a year where my wife’s by herself in Utah and I’m on a cot in Washington D.C. — as nice as the salary is, I can’t afford to have two places and have a quality of life that I’d like to have,” Chaffetz said. “You’ve got dozens and dozens of us that can’t afford two mortgages, kids in college and other types of things.”Representative Jason Chaffetz, a Republican from Utah, walks out of a closed House Republican election meeting on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Thursday, Oct. 8, 2015.Chaffetz is resigning during his fifth Congressional term. While chairman of the Oversight committee, he led the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server while she was Secretary of State.

Share this page to let your friends and neighbors know that the deep state is very real, and show them that even former members of the government are now letting us in on the dark secrets that many in Washington have been hiding for years!

Trey Gowdy Just Obliterated the FBI Over Hillary Investigation — “Almost Everything Was Done Differently”

Look everybody! Trey Gowdy is here! The GOP’s mop-boy for the real heavy hitters (like Devin Nunes and Chuck Grassley) has resurfaced to blast the FBI…after others had beaten him to it.

Appearing on Fox News’ ‘The Ingraham Angle’ on December 29, Rep. Gowdy (R-SC) lamented that his chairmanship of the House Oversight Committee investigation into Hillary Clinton’s criminal use of a private email server had ground to a halt because the Bureau and the Department of Justice (in the Obama and the Trump administrations) had REFUSED to turn over requested documents.

That was apparently all it took to shake Gowdy off the trail.

“An investigation is only as good as its access to documents and witnesses,” he is quoted by the Independent Journal Review (IJR) as saying.

Gowdy’s mercurial commitment to nailing Hillary Inc. to the wall aside, he still does offer up some great insight and fires off great questions.

On December 13, 2017, Gowdy was once again on Fox News, reports The Blaze, and began to publicly voice his frustration with the FBI and DOJ.

Following the revelation that FBI agents Peter Strzok, Lisa Page and Bruce Ohr were political hacks looking to bring down the President (a crime of the century that has been ignored by the ‘media’!) Gowdy tells Fox host Martha MaCallum, “I’m still trying to figure out why three FBI agents are discussing politics in the Deputy Director’s office, because you’re not supposed to discuss politics on federal ground and FBI agents aren’t supposed to engage in politics for Hatch Act reasons.”

Exactly a week later, Gowdy joined forces with Republican warrior Rep. Bob Goodlatte of Virginia in sending a letter to the DOJ demanding that Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, Chief of Staff James Rybicki, and F.B.I. Counsel Lisa Page appear for questioning before Congress, reported Vanity Fair.

The former director of the FBI, James Comey, is still in Gowdy’s sights as well. Gowdy told Foxs’ MacCallum in relation to Comey’s grossly premature exoneration of Clinton:

“If you have made the decision not to charge someone in May of 2016 before you have interviewed two-dozen witnesses, before you have interviewed the target of the investigation, then you’re going to have to explain how you reached that decision not to charge.”

You do indeed. Let us hope that if Comey is ever again questioned he is not allowed to weasel out of saying what he knows like McCabe. Comey needs to be the ethical person he so often tweets about and tell THE TRUTH!

Stay on them Gowdy, every minute of every day!

Trey Gowdy Says Everything Was Done Differently in Hillary Email Investigation

Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) doesn’t let anyone get away with a soft answer.

That’s why he pressed especially hard during the Hillary Clinton email probes for the truth. Gowdy laments he’s unable to get specific forms from the FBI that would allow him to conduct a proper investigation as chairman of the House Oversight Committee. He says that an investigation is “only as good as its access to documents and witnesses.”

Gowdy is attempting to explain why there has been no resolution to the Clinton probes.

“This has taken longer than it should … almost everything was done differently.” This delay by the FBI has prevented him from being able to interview people such as Peter Strzok and Lisa Page.

Gowdy has a way of making simple arguments that shed light on why the Clinton probe is still a serious matter. He has a question for former FBI Director James Comey: “Was the decision not to prosecute Clinton made months before it was announced?”

“If you have made the decision not to charge someone in May of 2016 before you have interviewed two-dozen witnesses, before you have interviewed the target of the investigation, then you’re going to have to explain how you reached that decision not to charge.”

Pointed questions such as these are why no one wants to be questioned by Gowdy.

Trey Gowdy says FBI agents were ‘conspiring’ and ‘plotting’ against Trump being elected

Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) reviewed his questioning of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein on Wednesday, adding that it appeared that three FBI officials were “conspiring or plotting” to decide the election.

Here’s what he said:

“This is a really bad fact pattern,” Gowdy said of the revelations about bias at the FBI and Justice Department.

“I hate it for Rod Rosenstein that he’s the one explaining it because he’s not [FBI official] Peter Strzok, and he’s not [Deputy FBI Director] Andy McCabe, and he’s not [former FBI Director] Jim Comey, so he’s having to do a little bit of clean up,” he explained. “But these are really bad facts if you care about an impartial, objective Department of Justice and FBI.”

“I’m still trying to figure out why three FBI agents are discussing politics in the Deputy Director’s office, because you’re not supposed to discuss politics on federal ground and FBI agents aren’t supposed to engage in politics for Hatch Act reasons,” he added.

Gowdy was referring to texts that show Strzok talking about an “insurance policy” against Trump winning the 2015 election. The text was in a trove of interactions obtained by the media and released Tuesday.

Predicts McCabe will be fired

Gowdy went on to say that he would be surprised if Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe were not fired from his position within the week.

“But the notion that three bureau agents would be conspiring or plotting on how to handle the outcome of a presidential election is the opposite of what you want in an objective, dispassionate, neutral FBI,” he explained.

Mueller in a no-win situation of his own making

Gowdy said that although he defended Mueller before, the special counsel has to explain how he hired people who were so biased against Trump. He added that Mueller was in a no-win situation because both Democrats and Republicans can accuse him of inappropriate behavior depending on what the outcome of his investigation might be.Trey Gowdy says FBI agents were ‘conspiring’ and ‘plotting’ against Trump being elected

Share this everywhere if you support Trey Gowdy.

President Trump Just Made a Huge Change for Social Security Recipients seniors are Elated

During the 2016 Election, Donald Trump promised not to touch Social Security. He vowed to reduce the burden of government. But he said that Social Security and a few other benefits, would not be harmed.Related imageThe fact remains, though, that Social Security is a bomb waiting to go off. For decades the government refused to reform it. They robbed Peter to pay Paul. Meaning that over time, there won’t be enough cash to pay the already low benefits.

With the landmark tax cuts passing this year, Social Security needs even greater reform. And that’s just what’s happening. Significant changes are being made to the program. But will it be enough? And do these changes hurt the many Americans who rely on the program?

From The Motley Fool:

For 2018, the basic structure of Social Security is the same in terms of how workers are taxed and how benefits are calculated and paid. However, there are a few notable changes to be aware of, such as the gradually increasing full retirement age and several thresholds and other Social Security figures that adjust over time with inflation…

The full or normal retirement age for Social Security benefits has been 66 years of age for some time now, but is set to gradually increase to 67 for Americans born after 1954…

Americans who will turn 62 in 2018 born in 1956 have a full retirement age of 66 years and four months, and those who will turn 63 in 2018 have a full retirement age of 66 years and two months…Related imageThe Social Security Administration announced a 2% cost-of-living adjustment, or COLA, for beneficiaries, starting with the December 2017 payment…

In 2018, the maximum taxable earnings amount is rising by $1,500 to $128,700, meaning that high-income individuals will end up paying more in Social Security tax than they did in 2017.

As more Baby Boomers retire, SS becomes a greater burden. Contrary to what people believe, you didn’t “pay into it” over your working life. That money went to Social Security beneficiaries at the time. People who retire today do so off the backs of young people who are only entering the workforce.

The burden of Social Security will be felt on our children and grandchildren. Taxing can get so bad, that few will be able to earn a living. Plus, there just won’t be enough money to support everyone on Social Security. So changes have to be made, whether people like it or not.

Do these current changes go far enough? The government is pushing back the age to collect. Plus, it is requiring more people pay into the program. Perhaps that will help ease the burden of this huge program. Perhaps not.

We will have to wait and see. Significant changes like pushing the retirement age to 70 or raising the cap to $200,000 might be needed in the near future. They might, in the end, be unavoidable.

The full retirement age is increasing for some eligible seniors
The full or normal retirement age for Social Security benefits has been 66 years of age for some time now, but is set to gradually increase to 67 for Americans born after 1954.Related imageThe reason this is important now is that the change has begun to affect people who are reaching the age of eligibility for Social Security benefits. Specifically, Americans who will turn 62 in 2018 born in 1956 have a full retirement age of 66 years and four months, and those who will turn 63 in 2018 have a full retirement age of 66 years and two months.

Here’s why this is important. Since most Americans claim Social Security before they reach full retirement age, this means that early retirement will have a more dramatic reduction. For example, if a worker with a full retirement age of 66 claims at 62, he or she would face a 25% reduction. If their full retirement age is 66 years and four months, the reduction percentage would be 25.8%.

Game Changer ?! Ruth Ginsburg Gets Devastating News, Federal Law Requires …

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg deny calls from many corners to excuse herself from the high court’s deliberations of Trump’s travel ban plan, considering her hostility toward the CEO.

Although The Supreme Court set June 12 as a due date to tell their decision on the travel ban, Trump’s government demanded to speed up the process. This means that the decision of keeping or declining the Forth Circuit order blocking implementation of the question could occur soon.Image result for Game Changer ?! Ruth Ginsburg Gets Devastating News, Federal Law Requires …When Trump took the Presidential seat, Ginsburg used every opportunity to criticize him on social media.

“He is a faker. He has no consistency about him, “she told CNN last July. “He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego. How has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns? ”

When The Associated Press asked her how the Supreme Court may be affected by a Trump administration, she stated: “I do not want to think about that possibility, but if it should be, then everything is up for grabs.”

Then, she shared her hatred in The New York Times, “I can not imagine what this place would be – I can not imagine what the country would be – with Donald Trump as our president.”

She also recalled on something her late husband used to say: “Now it’s time for us to move to New Zealand.”

Gregg Jarrett said for Fox News that “[a] ny justice … shall disqualify himself [or herself] in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned. He shall also disqualify himself … where he has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party. ”

Attorney David Weisberg in an opinion piece for The Hill on Monday stated that the lawful Code of Conduct is fair in regards to Ginsburg’s contrary to Trump’ deeds and her need to excuse herself in the travel ban case.

The code declares that a judge need to not “publicly endorse or oppose a candidate for public office.”

The code further states that “[a] judge … should act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.”Image result for Ruth GinsburgOn July 13 The New York Times editorial board rebuked Ginsburg after her mean anti-Trump comments, expressing that “Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg needs to drop the political punditry and the name-calling.”

Day after Ginsburg issued an announcement:

“On reflection, my recent remarks in response to press inquiries were ill-advised, and I regret making them. Judges should avoid commenting on a candidate for public office. In the future I will be more circumspect. ”

The past fall liberal Harvard law educator Allen Dershowitz said that Ginsburgmust to excuse herself from all Trump related cases, given her past comments.

Jarrett closes up his opinion with, “The noble traditions of the Supreme Court will be compromised should Ruth Bader Ginsburg decide she is above the law and beyond the scruples it demands.”

Video Source Top Stories Today:

The government code expresses that “[a] judge … should act consistently in a way that advances open trust in the honesty and unprejudiced nature of the legal.”

It’s not simply preservationists who figure Ginsberg ought to recuse herself from the discourse about the migration official request. Conspicuous liberal attorney Alan Dershowitz said that “in a perfect world, she ought to recuse herself.”

“In a perfect world, she ought to recuse herself,” Dershowitz, a Harvard Law educator emeritus, said Friday on America Talks Live.

“Be that as it may, on the other hand, [former justice] Sandra Day O’Connor should’ve recused herself from [George W.] Bush versus [Al] Gore since she told individuals when she saw the systems calling at first Florida for Gore, she stated, ‘that is a calamity’ and she exited and that was promoted and she sat looking into the issue.

“The tenets are distinctive for the Supreme Court. There are no tenets for the Supreme Court. They choose themselves regardless of whether to recuse themselves … [The late Antonin] Scalia didn’t recuse himself despite the fact that his child remained to land a position if Bush won the decision instead of Gore.”Image result for Ruth GinsburgObviously, in light of the fact that there truly are no guidelines on this – Supreme Court Justices seem, by all accounts, to be over these government laws – it will be dependent upon Ginsberg herself regardless of whether she has the moral courage to concede she’s one-sided and recuses herself from voting working on it on Monday.

What do you think about this? Please, share your thoughts in the comment section below.

WATCH Sarah Huckabee Put This Rude Reporter in Her PLACE for Disrespecting President Trump

Sarah Huckabee is back today with another on camera press briefing. As usual, reporters were poised to attack but Sarah was not having any of it.

In a continuation on the feud from yesterday, Kirsten Welker of NBC, pushed Sarah on the on-going spat between Trump and Steve Bannon.

After an eventful evening yesterday with Trump’s lawyers sending cease-and-desist letters to Steve Bannon and Michael Wolff regarding an upcoming book, the reporters would not stop asking about it despite there being much more newsworthy events happening.Image result for WATCH Sarah Huckabee Put This Rude Reporter in Her PLACE for Disrespecting President Trump“As a candidate, President Trump threatened some 20 lawsuits and followed through with two of them. Why should Steve Bannon and Michael Wolff be concerned?”

Sarah laid it out for her plain and simple.

“I think that regardless of whether there is a lawsuit or not they should be concerned about peddling fake stories. They should be concerned about putting out information that’s not true. They should be concerned about the fact that we are spending all of our time here focused on talking about THIS instead of things that the people in this country care about.”

Then, Kristen said something that BACKFIRED immediately!

“Doesn’t this run the risk of increasing book sales by drawing attention to this?”

Sarah scoffed and then gave her a brutal reality check.

“I think you guys are the ones that are drawing the attention. Every question, basically, that I’ve been asked has to do with that. It’s not like I came out here and read excerpts from the book so I don’t think that I would be responsible for the questions that you ask. In fact, if I tried to do that I’m sure I would certainly be attacked for trying.”

These reporters have no shame! Here we have a direct example of reporters spending precious time talking about this book and then accusing Sarah of talking about the book. It’s ridiculous!

According to Another Source:
Sarah Huckabee is back today with another on camera press briefing. As usual, reporters were poised to attack but Sarah was not having any of it.

In a continuation on the feud from yesterday, Kirsten Welker of NBC, pushed Sarah on the on-going spat between Trump and Steve Bannon.

After an eventful evening yesterday with Trump’s lawyers sending cease-and-desist letters to Steve Bannon and Michael Wolff regarding an upcoming book, the reporters would not stop asking about it despite there being much more newsworthy events happening.

“As a candidate, President Trump threatened some 20 lawsuits and followed through with two of them. Why should Steve Bannon and Michael Wolff be concerned?”

Sarah laid it out for her plain and simple.

“I think that regardless of whether there is a lawsuit or not they should be concerned about peddling fake stories. They should be concerned about putting out information that’s not true. They should be concerned about the fact that we are spending all of our time here focused on talking about THIS instead of things that the people in this country care about.”Image result for sarah huckabee sandersThen, Kristen said something that BACKFIRED immediately!

“Doesn’t this run the risk of increasing book sales by drawing attention to this?”

Sarah scoffed and then gave her a brutal reality check.

“I think you guys are the ones that are drawing the attention. Every question, basically, that I’ve been asked has to do with that. It’s not like I came out here and read excerpts from the book so I don’t think that I would be responsible for the questions that you ask. In fact, if I tried to do that I’m sure I would certainly be attacked for trying.”

These reporters have no shame! Here we have a direct example of reporters spending precious time talking about this book and then accusing Sarah of talking about the book. It’s ridiculous!

SHARE if you think the mainstream media doesn’t really care about REAL news that Americans want to hear about!